GeneralSociety

First Impressions of China

Anyone who is fairly informed probably has some knowledge or vague impressions of China. We are well aware of China’s breakneck economic growth in the last two decades. We are also aware of China’s hard consequences for its fastidious growth. Beijing recently made the news with record air pollution. The north of China has no water and the central government is actively planning a huge water pipeline from the south to the north. Other stories include Foxconn’s worker exploitation, grave civil rights abuses and vast political corruption.

Living in Taiwan for three years certainly encouraged these impressions and probably added some more stereotypes. The Taiwanese love to to joke about the rude manners and terse sounding accents mainlanders have.

However, I have found that China has been quite… pleasant. It’s different than Taiwan in ways I didn’t expect. I suppose I thought it would be poorer and the streets covered in garbage, but it is fairly well developed. Granted, there are some things about China that are true to the rumors I’ve heard, such as sometimes a public bathroom is nothing more than a shared ditch in the ground. But there are some great things going on here that America could use in the field of sustainable living.

I’ve always found it somewhat obtuse and counter-productive when pundits compare Chinese and American models of economy, politics, or even sustainability. The biggest offender of this charge is Thomas Friedman and his lamentations for building a New Green America. China and the US are such different places with different cultural influences, systems of politics, education, economy, etc. It’s so easy to contrast the two countries when you want to criticize the other. However, despite that, as I am here I feel that I better make a few “Well, in China, they bla bla bla more than America” statements.

One thing that you immediately notice as a traveler is the wide use and popularity of the e-bike. The electric scooter is everywhere and if you’re not paying attention probably right behind you. They are quiet, efficient and emit no carbon dioxide! It’s incredible to see these things in action all over cities. People just plug their e-bike in at night to a normal household electrical outlet and in the morning will have a full battery that can drive about 30-40 kilometers before it needs another charge. Smaller and newer scooters need less time for a charge since bigger vehicles need more power to compensate for the extra size and mass. It does make one wonder, why don’t we have these in the states? You would save so much money on gas. This, however, is when this line of thinking becomes inane. We don’t have these in the states because the oil companies have blocked every move towards electric transportation in the states. There are no government subsidies of comprehensive electric transportation to speak of except California’s subsidizing of hybrid cars, whereas the Chinese government has the ability to outlaw combustion engines for scooters. It’s a matter of collecting inspiration for sustainable strategies and then working to overcome our homegrown obstacles to them. I wonder what would happen if a business in Portland or San Francisco started selling e-bikes that people could power from their house or apartment?


Communal gardens in China

Another thing that I noticed is that China has local food in spades. Local agriculture and gardens abound wherever there is space. In Nanning, we stayed at a friend’s apartment that overlooked a river park where I counted three communal gardens and other crops of food being grown near the river bank. I have heard some Americans complain that vegetable gardens in city parks aren’t pretty (that’s debatable) but I know that Chinese urban areas are a lot more food resilient than most American cities and towns. The older generation of Chinese people still clearly remember the terrible famine that came with the cultural revolution. Americans have no visceral experience of a great hunger and thus have been completely detached from our food and the process to grow it. It is our abundance of wealth that consolidated our food industry which has created vulnerable, poor diets, high health costs and lack of healthy produce.


All hail development! This pristine farmland in Guilin
will be turned into golf courses and condominiums! Yay!

Sadly, China seems to be drunk on development and one soon realizes they have been intently starting at the American model of development as a blueprint for success. The world’s limited resources will not allow this type of development so we had better find a new way of living sustainably or we will be on a sustainable path to not living.

~~~~~

Editor’s Addition: Most of us in the West are highly, if not completely, ignorant about how the ‘totalitarian’ Chinese one-party political system operates. The video below may be somewhat of an eye-opener for many of you…. In the context of the article above, I’d encourage you to take a watch:

//www.youtube.com/embed/s0YjL9rZyR0

7 Comments

  1. Great article. There is however one misleading fact I’d like to point out. You state that the e-bike does not emit any CO2, true enough, but this is a bit misleading. Because, like you say, at night those bikes are plugged into the grid, which then generates CO2. So if anything, the CO2 emissions, which I am sure is MUCH lower than other automobiles, is merely spatially segregated.

    Just want to point out that I am not putting down the concept, or efficacy, it would be a MAJOR improvement to switch to e-bikes, just want to bring some awareness to this simple fact that as long as the power plants supplying e-bikes with energy are not green, e-bikes, or any other electrical vehicle for that matter, are not green.

  2. It’s not really misleading, e-bikes can be charged off a solar panel on your roof, either coupled to a battery and inverter, or direct charged straight, either way, no CO2 generated.

    The amount of CO2 generated per kWh depends on how the electricity is generated.

    Let’s get some real figures here, speculation is pointless:

    The amount of power used to recharge an e-bike battery is miniscule compared to electric cars, which have lower CO2 emissions than regular petrol driven cars.

    Here is a summary of US Dept. of Energy findings:

    According to the US Department of Energy, CO2 emissions for electricity generated from coal result in 0.93 kg of CO2 per kWh or roughly 0.14 kg(CO2)/km. CO2 emissions from electricity produced from all types of fuel using the mix of sources in the US as of 2008 results in 0.61 kg of CO2 per kWh or 0.095 kg(CO2)/km from an electric vehicle with a 0.155 kWh/km; 0.56 MJ/km) energy consumption (typical). Gasoline used in Internal Combustion Engine automobiles produces 2.34 kg(CO2)/L directly and an undetermined amount of CO2 in refining the crude oil, and transporting the gasoline to retail point of sale. With a US fleet average of 11.0 L/100 km (very similar average to the Australian fleet) in 2008, this would indicate a CO2 production of 0.258 kg/km driven. Electric powered automobiles, even using the most CO2 intensive coal produced electricity, produce half the emissions of gasoline powered automobiles.

    An electric bike with a 36V Li-ion 10Ah battery will take 36 volts x 10 Amp-hours / 1000 = 0.36 kWh to charge over five hours, so total power is 5 x 0.36 = 1.8 kWh which will last 40-60km.

    In a worst case scenario, 1.8kWh x 0.93kg CO2 per kWh = 1.67, divide by 40km = 0.042kg CO2 per km.

    Better case scenario, 1.8kWh x 0.61kg CO2 per kWh = 1.10, divide by 60km = 0.018kg CO2 per km.

    Petrol driven car – 0.258 kg(CO2)/km
    Electric car – 0.095 kg(CO2)/km

    E-bike has up to 15 times less CO2 emission per km than a petrol driven car.

    Even in worst case scenarios where electricity is generated using very polluting power generators, e-bikes still produce 6 times less CO2 emission per km than a petrol driven car.

    An electric car in the worst case scenario also produces only half the CO2 emissions of a petrol driven car.

    More so, there is no air pollution from the toxic petrol and diesel combustion by-products choking the cities where the majority of people live…

  3. While I agree generaly with the above, I have some experience with e-bikes and scooters both owning and then building(for my own use) various types.The average Chinese e- bike is an ecological disaster. Firstly they use small lead acid batteries”power packs” which a short effective life span and short and long term disposal issues.Secondly the power used to charge these bikes comes from coal power generaly so mostly the carbon emmissions are simply moved elsewhere also charging batteries is not an efficient proccess then discharging them through inefficient controllers to wheel motors is a particularly poor way of doing the job.Thirdly most of the bikes ive seen here in Australia have been very poorly made and have required major repair or replacement of main components with less than a year of use, often after less than 3000 kilometers. I have also tried hard to find a better way of using battery power and have used some of the kits availiable here to convert quality bicycles to e-bikes with greater success, however it is hard to make a case for the economics of doing this. None the less there are high quality though expensive kits available. My main concerns are the battery disposal/recycling problem for all types, and the short service life of many cheap e-bikes.

  4. Hi Ted,
    thanks for your posts and articles, very interesting indeed! I work for an NGO in Europe on climate change, environment and development issues and I’m currently in Hangzhou with a local environmental NGO covering the increasing role of NGOs in climate change policies, particularly on carbon markets. You can read my blog (https://carbonmarketwatch.org/read-our-blog/)

    I’d be interested to get in touch with you to exchange some impressions and for personal interest on permaculture. my email address is [email protected]

    thanks
    Diego

  5. I’ve lived in China and I was wondered about the e-bikes, but then I got to know the chinese new consumption style of buying and trashing everything as soon as it brakes down or before. I wouldn’t be surprised that the e-bikes become an ecological disaster.
    Going one step forward, the best solution for clean transportation are the air compressed motors, still in development. You can charge them with solar energy. 100% free energy.
    About the communal gardens,you find them everywhere. Pleople even grow vegetables in the roadside. The problem with that is soil contamination. The grow food organically, but they may be eating heavy metals too do to environmental contamination. They seem to not realize completely about that.

  6. Hey guys! Thanks for taking an interest in my musings about China. More articles are on the way.

    I definitely agree with earlier comments made about the e-bike and its ecological imperfections that come with it. I was simply noticing the milestones that can be made when governments sponsor something progressive like electronic transportation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button