Alternatives to Political SystemsConsumerismEconomicsFood ShortagesGlobal Warming/Climate ChangePeak OilPeople SystemsSocietySoil Erosion & ContaminationWater Contaminaton & Loss

Let No Man Say It Cannot Be Done

by Lester R. Brown, Earth Policy Institute

We need an economy for the twenty-first century, one that is in sync with the earth and its natural support systems, not one that is destroying them. The fossil fuel-based, automobile-centered, throwaway economy that evolved in western industrial societies is no longer a viable model—not for the countries that shaped it or for those that are emulating them. In short, we need to build a new economy, one powered with carbon-free sources of energy—wind, solar, and geothermal—one that has a diversified transport system and that reuses and recycles everything. We can change course and move onto a path of sustainable progress, but it will take a massive mobilization—at wartime speed.

Whenever I begin to feel overwhelmed by the scale and urgency of the changes we need to make, I reread the economic history of U.S. involvement in World War II because it is such an inspiring study in rapid mobilization. Initially, the United States resisted involvement in the war and responded only after it was directly attacked at Pearl Harbor. But respond it did. After an all-out commitment, the U.S. engagement helped turn the tide of war, leading the Allied Forces to victory within three-and-a-half years.

In his State of the Union address on January 6, 1942, one month after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt announced the country’s arms production goals. The United States, he said, was planning to produce 45,000 tanks, 60,000 planes, and several thousand ships. He added, “Let no man say it cannot be done.”

No one had ever seen such huge arms production numbers. Public skepticism abounded. But Roosevelt and his colleagues realized that the world’s largest concentration of industrial power was in the U.S. automobile industry. Even during the Depression, the United States was producing 3 million or more cars a year.

After his State of the Union address, Roosevelt met with auto industry leaders, indicating that the country would rely heavily on them to reach these arms production goals. Initially they expected to continue making cars and simply add on the production of armaments. What they did not yet know was that the sale of new cars would soon be banned. From early February 1942 through the end of 1944, nearly three years, essentially no cars were produced in the United States.

In addition to a ban on the sale of new cars, residential and highway construction was halted, and driving for pleasure was banned. Suddenly people were recycling and planting victory gardens. Strategic goods—including tires, gasoline, fuel oil, and sugar—were rationed beginning in 1942. Yet 1942 witnessed the greatest expansion of industrial output in the nation’s history—all for military use. Wartime aircraft needs were enormous. They included not only fighters, bombers, and reconnaissance planes, but also the troop and cargo transports needed to fight a war on distant fronts. From the beginning of 1942 through 1944, the United States far exceeded the initial goal of 60,000 planes, turning out a staggering 229,600 aircraft, a fleet so vast it is hard even today to visualize it. Equally impressive, by the end of the war more than 5,000 ships were added to the 1,000 or so that made up the American Merchant Fleet in 1939.

In her book No Ordinary Time, Doris Kearns Goodwin describes how various firms converted. A sparkplug factory switched to the production of machine guns. A manufacturer of stoves produced lifeboats. A merry-go-round factory made gun mounts; a toy company turned out compasses; a corset manufacturer produced grenade belts; and a pinball machine plant made armor-piercing shells.

In retrospect, the speed of this conversion from a peacetime to a wartime economy is stunning. The harnessing of U.S. industrial power tipped the scales decisively toward the Allied Forces, reversing the tide of war. Germany and Japan, already fully extended, could not counter this effort. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill often quoted his foreign secretary, Sir Edward Grey: “The United States is like a giant boiler. Once the fire is lighted under it, there is no limit to the power it can generate.”

The point is that it did not take decades to restructure the U.S. industrial economy. It did not take years. It was done in a matter of months. If we could restructure the U.S. industrial economy in months, then we can restructure the world energy economy during this decade.

With numerous U.S. automobile assembly lines currently idled, it would be a relatively simple matter to retool some of them to produce wind turbines, as the Ford Motor Company did in World War II with B-24 bombers, helping the world to quickly harness its vast wind energy resources. This would help the world see that the economy can be restructured quickly, profitably, and in a way that enhances global security.

The world now has the technologies and financial resources to stabilize climate, eradicate poverty, stabilize population, restore the economy’s natural support systems, and, above all, restore hope. The United States, the wealthiest society that has ever existed, has the resources and leadership to lead this effort.

One of the questions I hear most frequently is, What can I do? People often expect me to suggest lifestyle changes, such as recycling newspapers or changing light bulbs. These are essential, but they are not nearly enough. Restructuring the global economy means becoming politically active, working for the needed changes, as the grassroots campaign against coal-fired power plants is doing. Saving civilization is not a spectator sport.

Inform yourself. Read about the issues. Share the Earth Policy Institute’s publications with friends. Pick an issue that’s meaningful to you, such as tax restructuring to create an honest market, phasing out coal-fired power plants, or developing a world class-recycling system in your community. Or join a group that is working to provide family planning services to the 215 million women who want to plan their families but lack the means to do so. You might want to organize a small group of like-minded individuals to work on an issue that is of mutual concern. You can begin by talking with others to help select an issue to work on.

Once your group is informed and has a clearly defined goal, ask to meet with your elected representatives on the city council or the state or national legislature. Write or e-mail your elected representatives about the need to restructure taxes and eliminate fossil fuel subsidies. Remind them that leaving environmental costs off the books may offer a sense of prosperity in the short run, but it leads to collapse in the long run.

During World War II, the military draft asked millions of young men to risk the ultimate sacrifice. But we are called on only to be politically active and to make lifestyle changes. During World War II, President Roosevelt frequently asked Americans to adjust their lifestyles and Americans responded, working together for a common goal. What contributions can we each make today, in time, money, or reduced consumption, to help save civilization?

The choice is ours—yours and mine. We can stay with business as usual and preside over an economy that continues to destroy its natural support systems until it destroys itself, or we can be the generation that changes direction, moving the world onto a path of sustained progress. The choice will be made by our generation, but it will affect life on earth for all generations to come.

Further Reading:

5 Comments

  1. If we can tap into America’s competitive nature then we would see some massive progress. I think a renewable energy race is in order.

  2. “James Howard Kunstler believes that our suburban sprawl is unsustainable, and will have to be abandoned with the end of cheap oil. In his nightmare scenario of societal breakdown, there is no more state structure capable of maintaining law and order, let alone enforcing these stupid urban codes. Do we have to come to that point to substitute the codes on the books today with city-regenerating codes? Illegal or not, people will eventually have to abandon those codes and replace them with New Urbanist codes.” – From Nikos A. Salingaros last book, Twelve Lectures On Architecture, page 203: https://www.bod.de/index.php?id=296&objk_id=354912

  3. So the plan is to re-use all the old WWII propaganda but replace “Japs” with “consumerism” and “Krauts” with “automobiles” in this renewed effort to grant the state total centralized control of the economy? If you want vast resources wasted on killing hundreds of millions of innocent people instead of being used to improve our lives peacefully, then yes, government is probably the answer.

  4. Would your group have interest in purifying water using fresh-water plankton, biomass, which takes longer than flocking chemicals, a couple of days vs hours, but you get the biomass to squeeze for biodiesel as fuel, about 2-gallons a day per person, 3 per pig, 5 per dairy cow, 1.2 per chicken …

    Have some of a team to work on this but lack having it pushed forward.

    yours,

    tom mallard

  5. The real and deeper cause of our global crisis is not the lack of
    political will to re-focus, within 3 months, our vast production line potential on to renewable energy infrastructure. (That is so even if the conversion of the powerful climate-skeptical lobbies to support an instant, World War 2 Roosevelt style mega-effort for a renewable future was a realistic possibility.)
    The cause is our lust for more and more energy use and material goods, motivated by false values and priorities, giving us a pathetically shallow definition of quality of life, pushed every moment by corporate capitalism’s media-massed psychological weaponry to maintain our discontent with anything less.
    What’s the real solution? Not, simplistically, a renewable way to energise our obsessive consumption and preserve existing gross inequalities.
    It’s a much simpler, life-style re-connected with nature, and each other in true community, all exercised as a sacred duty of justice to all beings and to the Mystery (God or whatever you call it) of the cosmos and our eco-system as its been given to us —that is the real solution.
    As Mahatma Ghandi said, “live a simple life, that others may simply live”. We should now somewhat re-define “others” as all species. Maybe Bolivia’s new consitution has some answers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button